Do you want to buy antibiotics online without prescription? https://buyantibiotics24h.net/ - This is pharmacy online for you!
Shedler.ampsy.2010.pdf
The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
University of Colorado Denver School of MedicineEmpirical evidence supports the efficacy of psychodynamic
over time. Finally, I consider evidence that nonpsychody-
therapy. Effect sizes for psychodynamic therapy are as
namic therapies may be effective in part because the more
large as those reported for other therapies that have been
skilled practitioners utilize interventions that have long
actively promoted as “empirically supported” and “evi-
been central to psychodynamic theory and practice. dence based.” In addition, patients who receive psychody-namic therapy maintain therapeutic gains and appear toDistinctive Features of continue to improve after treatment ends. Finally, nonpsy-Psychodynamic Technique chodynamic therapies may be effective in part because themore skilled practitioners utilize techniques that have longPsychodynamic or psychoanalytic psychotherapy1 re-
been central to psychodynamic theory and practice. The
fers to a range of treatments based on psychoanalytic
perception that psychodynamic approaches lack empirical
concepts and methods that involve less frequent meetings
support does not accord with available scientific evidence
and may be considerably briefer than psychoanalysis
and may reflect selective dissemination of research find-
proper. Session frequency is typically once or twice per
week, and the treatment may be either time limited or openended. The essence of psychodynamic therapy is exploring
those aspects of self that are not fully known, especially as
process, psychoanalysis, psychodynamic therapy, meta-
they are manifested and potentially influenced in the ther-
Undergraduate textbooks too often equate psychoan-
here is a belief in some quarters that psychodynamic
alytic or psychodynamic therapies with some of the more
concepts and treatments lack empirical support or
outlandish and inaccessible speculations made by Sigmund
that scientific evidence shows that other forms of
Freud roughly a century ago, rarely presenting mainstream
treatment are more effective. The belief appears to have
psychodynamic concepts as understood and practiced to-
taken on a life of its own. Academicians repeat it to one
day. Such presentations, along with caricatured depictions
another, as do health care administrators, as do health care
in the popular media, have contributed to widespread mis-
policymakers. With each repetition, its apparent credibility
understanding of psychodynamic treatment (for discussion
grows. At some point, there seems little need to question or
of how clinical psychoanalysis is represented and misrep-
revisit it because “everyone” knows it to be so.
resented in undergraduate curricula, see Bornstein, 1988,
The scientific evidence tells a different story: Consid-
1995; Hansell, 2005; Redmond & Shulman, 2008). To help
erable research supports the efficacy and effectiveness of
dispel possible myths and facilitate greater understanding
psychodynamic therapy. The discrepancy between percep-
of psychodynamic practice, in this section I review core
tions and evidence may be due, in part, to biases in the
features of contemporary psychodynamic technique.
dissemination of research findings. One potential source of
Blagys and Hilsenroth (2000) conducted a search of
bias is a lingering distaste in the mental health professions
the PsycLit database to identify empirical studies that com-
for past psychoanalytic arrogance and authority. In decades
pared the process and technique of manualized psychody-
past, American psychoanalysis was dominated by a hierar-
namic therapy with that of manualized cognitive behavioral
chical medical establishment that denied training to non-
therapy (CBT). Seven features reliably distinguished psy-
MDs and adopted a dismissive stance toward research. This
chodynamic therapy from other therapies, as determined by
stance did not win friends in academic circles. When em-
empirical examination of actual session recordings and
pirical findings emerged that supported nonpsychodynamictreatments, many academicians greeted them enthusiasti-cally and were eager to discuss and disseminate them.
I thank Mark Hilsenroth for his extensive contributions to this article;
When empirical evidence supported psychodynamic con-
Marc Diener for providing some of the information reported here; Robert
cepts and treatments, it was often overlooked.
Feinstein, Glen Gabbard, Michael Karson, Kenneth Levy, Nancy McWil-liams, Robert Michels, George Stricker, and Robert Wallerstein for their
This article brings together findings from several em-
comments on drafts of the article; and the 500-plus members of the
pirical literatures that bear on the efficacy of psychody-
Psychodynamic Research Listserv for their collective wisdom and sup-
namic treatment. I first outline the distinctive features of
psychodynamic therapy. I next review empirical evidence
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed
for the efficacy of psychodynamic treatment, including
to Jonathan Shedler, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colo-rado Denver School of Medicine, Mail Stop A011-04, 13001 East 17th
evidence that patients who receive psychodynamic therapy
Place, Aurora, CO 80045. E-mail: jonathan@shedler.com
not only maintain therapeutic gains but continue to improve
1 I use the terms psychoanalytic and psychodynamic interchangeably.
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
2010 American Psychological Association 0003-066X/10/$12.00
Psychodynamic therapists actively focus on and exploreavoidances. 3. Identification of recurring themes and patterns. Psychodynamic therapists work to identify and explore recurring themes and patterns in patients’ thoughts, feelings, self-concept, relationships, and life ex- periences. In some cases, a patient may be acutely aware of recurring patterns that are painful or self-defeating but feel unable to escape them (e.g., a man who repeatedly finds himself drawn to romantic partners who are emotionally unavailable; a woman who regularly sabotages herself when success is at hand). In other cases, the patient may be unaware of the patterns until the therapist helps him or her recognize and understand them. 4. Discussion of past experience (develop- mental focus). Related to the identification of recur- ring themes and patterns is the recognition that past expe- rience, especially early experiences of attachment figures, affects our relation to, and experience of, the present. Psychodynamic therapists explore early experiences, the Jonathan
relation between past and present, and the ways in which
the past tends to “live on” in the present. The focus is noton the past for its own sake, but rather on how the pastsheds light on current psychological difficulties. The goal isto help patients free themselves from the bonds of past
transcripts (note that the features listed below concern
experience in order to live more fully in the present.
process and technique only, not underlying principles that
5. Focus on interpersonal relations. Psy-
inform these techniques; for a discussion of concepts and
chodynamic therapy places heavy emphasis on patients’
principles, see Gabbard, 2004; McWilliams, 2004; Shedler,
relationships and interpersonal experience (in theoretical
terms, object relations and attachment). Both adaptive and
1. Focus on affect and expression of emo-
nonadaptive aspects of personality and self-concept are
tion. Psychodynamic therapy encourages exploration
forged in the context of attachment relationships, and psy-
and discussion of the full range of a patient’s emotions. The
chological difficulties often arise when problematic inter-
therapist helps the patient describe and put words to feel-
personal patterns interfere with a person’s ability to meet
ings, including contradictory feelings, feelings that are
troubling or threatening, and feelings that the patient may
6. Focus on the therapy relationship. The
not initially be able to recognize or acknowledge (this
relationship between therapist and patient is itself an im-
stands in contrast to a cognitive focus, where the greater
portant interpersonal relationship, one that can become
emphasis is on thoughts and beliefs; Blagys & Hilsenroth,
deeply meaningful and emotionally charged. To the extent
2002; Burum & Goldfried, 2007). There is also a recogni-
that there are repetitive themes in a person’s relationships
tion that intellectual insight is not the same as emotional
and manner of interacting, these themes tend to emerge in
insight, which resonates at a deep level and leads to change
some form in the therapy relationship. For example, a
(this is one reason why many intelligent and psychologi-
person prone to distrust others may view the therapist with
cally minded people can explain the reasons for their dif-
suspicion; a person who fears disapproval, rejection, or
ficulties, yet their understanding does not help them over-
abandonment may fear rejection by the therapist, whether
knowingly or unknowingly; a person who struggles with
2. Exploration of attempts to avoid dis-
anger and hostility may struggle with anger toward the
tressing thoughts and feelings. People do a great
therapist; and so on (these are relatively crude examples;
many things, knowingly and unknowingly, to avoid aspects
the repetition of interpersonal themes in the therapy rela-
of experience that are troubling. This avoidance (in theo-
tionship is often more complex and subtle than these ex-
retical terms, defense and resistance) may take coarse
amples suggest). The recurrence of interpersonal themes in
forms, such as missing sessions, arriving late, or being
the therapy relationship (in theoretical terms, transference
evasive. It may take subtle forms that are difficult to
and countertransference) provides a unique opportunity to
recognize in ordinary social discourse, such as subtle shifts
explore and rework them in vivo. The goal is greater
of topic when certain ideas arise, focusing on incidental
flexibility in interpersonal relationships and an enhanced
aspects of an experience rather than on what is psycholog-
capacity to meet interpersonal needs.
ically meaningful, attending to facts and events to the
7. Exploration of fantasy life. In contrast to
exclusion of affect, focusing on external circumstances
other therapies in which the therapist may actively structure
rather than one’s own role in shaping events, and so on.
sessions or follow a predetermined agenda, psychodynamic
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
therapy encourages patients to speak freely about whatever
meta-analyses have similarly supported the efficacy of psy-
is on their minds. When patients do this (and most patients
chotherapy. The influential review by Lipsey and Wilson
require considerable help from the therapist before they can
(1993) tabulated results for 18 meta-analyses concerned
truly speak freely), their thoughts naturally range over
with general psychotherapy outcomes, which had a median
many areas of mental life, including desires, fears, fanta-
effect size of 0.75. It also tabulated results for 23 meta-
sies, dreams, and daydreams (which in many cases the
analyses concerned with outcomes in CBT and behavior
patient has not previously attempted to put into words). All
modification, which had a median effect size of 0.62. A
of this material is a rich source of information about how
meta-analysis by Robinson, Berman, and Neimeyer (1990)
the person views self and others, interprets and makes
summarized the findings of 37 psychotherapy studies con-
sense of experience, avoids aspects of experience, or inter-
cerned specifically with outcomes in the treatment of de-
feres with a potential capacity to find greater enjoyment
pression, which had an overall effect size of 0.73. These are
relatively large effects. (For a review of psychotherapy
The last sentence hints at a larger goal that is implicit
efficacy and effectiveness research, see Lambert & Ogles,
in all of the others: The goals of psychodynamic therapyinclude, but extend beyond, symptom remission. Success-
ful treatment should not only relieve symptoms (i.e., get rid
To provide some points of reference, it is instructive
of something) but also foster the positive presence of
to consider effect sizes for antidepressant medications. An
psychological capacities and resources. Depending on the
analysis of U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA)
person and the circumstances, these might include the
databases (published and unpublished studies) reported in
capacity to have more fulfilling relationships, make more
the New England Journal of Medicine found effect sizes of
effective use of one’s talents and abilities, maintain a
0.26 for fluoxetine (Prozac), 0.26 for sertraline (Zoloft),
realistically based sense of self-esteem, tolerate a wider
0.24 for citalopram (Celexa), 0.31 for escitalopram (Lexa-
range of affect, have more satisfying sexual experiences,
pro), and 0.30 for duloxetine (Cymbalta). The overall mean
understand self and others in more nuanced and sophisti-
effect size for antidepressant medications approved by the
cated ways, and face life’s challenges with greater freedom
FDA between 1987 and 2004 was 0.31 (Turner, Matthews,
and flexibility. Such ends are pursued through a process of
Linardatos, Tell, & Rosenthal, 2008).3 A meta-analysis
self-reflection, self-exploration, and self-discovery that
reported in the prestigious Cochrane Library (Moncrieff,
takes place in the context of a safe and deeply authentic
Wessely, & Hardy, 2004) found an effect size of 0.17 for
relationship between therapist and patient. (For a jargon-
tricyclic antidepressants compared with active placebo (an
free introduction to contemporary psychodynamic thought,
active placebo mimics the side effects of an antidepressant
see That Was Then, This Is Now: Psychoanalytic Psycho-
drug but is not itself an antidepressant).4 These are rela-
therapy for the Rest of Us [Shedler, 2006a, which is freely
tively small effects. Methodological differences between
available for download at http://psychsystems.net/shedler.
medication trials and psychotherapy trials are sufficiently
great that effect sizes may not be directly comparable, and
How Effective Is Psychotherapy in
the findings should not be interpreted as conclusive evi-dence that psychotherapy is more effective. Effect sizes for
General?
antidepressant medications are reported to provide refer-
In psychology and in medicine more generally, meta-anal-
ence points that will be familiar to many readers (for more
ysis is a widely accepted method for summarizing and
comprehensive listings of effect size reference points, see,
synthesizing the findings of independent studies (Lipsey &
e.g., Lipsey & Wilson, 1993; Meyer et al., 2001).
Wilson, 2001; Rosenthal, 1991; Rosenthal & DiMatteo,2001). Meta-analysis makes the results of different studies
comparable by converting findings into a common metric,
This score, known as the standardized mean difference, is used to
summarize the findings of randomized control trials. More broadly, the
allowing findings to be aggregated or pooled across studies.
concept effect size may refer to any measure that expresses the magnitude
A widely used metric is effect size, which is the difference
of a research finding (Rosenthal & Rosnow, 2008).
between treatment and control groups, expressed in stan-
3 The measure of effect size in this study was Hedges’ g (Hedges,
dard deviation units.2 An effect size of 1.0 means that the
1982) rather than Cohen’s d (Cohen, 1988), which is more commonlyreported. The two measures are based on slightly different computa-
average treated patient is one standard deviation healthier
tional formulas, but in this case the choice of formula would have
on the normal distribution or bell curve than the average
made no difference: “Because of the large sample size (over 12,000),
untreated patient. An effect size of 0.8 is considered a large
there is no change in going from g to d; both values are .31 to two
effect in psychological and medical research, an effect size
decimal places” (R. Rosenthal, personal communication to Marc Die-
of 0.5 is considered a moderate effect, and an effect size of
4 Although antidepressant trials are intended to be double-blind, the
0.2 is considered a small effect (Cohen, 1988).
blind is easily penetrated because the adverse side effects of antidepres-
The first major meta-analysis of psychotherapy out-
sant medications are physically discernible and widely known. Study
come studies included 475 studies and yielded an overall
participants and their doctors can therefore figure out whether they are
effect size (various diagnoses and treatments) of 0.85 for
receiving medication or placebo, and effects attributed to medication maybe inflated by expectancy and demand effects. Use of “active” placebos
patients who received psychotherapy compared with un-
better protects the blind, and the resulting effect sizes are approximately
treated controls (Smith, Glass, & Miller, 1980). Subsequent
half as large as those otherwise reported.
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
How Effective Is Psychodynamic
treatment was 16 weeks), the mean follow-up period was 13
Therapy?
weeks and the effect size was 1.0. The authors concluded thatboth treatments demonstrated effectiveness. A more recent
A recent and especially methodologically rigorous meta-
review of short-term (average of 30.7 sessions) psychody-
analysis of psychodynamic therapy, published by the
namic therapy for personality disorders included data from
Cochrane Library,5 included 23 randomized controlled
seven randomized controlled trials (Messer & Abbass, in
trials of 1,431 patients (Abbass, Hancock, Henderson, &
press). The study assessed outcome at the longest follow-up
Kisely, 2006). The studies compared patients with a
period available (an average of 18.9 months posttreatment)
range of common mental disorders6 who received short-
and reported effect sizes of 0.91 for general symptom im-
term (Ͻ 40 hours) psychodynamic therapy with controls
provement (N ϭ 7 studies) and 0.97 for improvement in
(wait list, minimal treatment, or “treatment as usual”)
interpersonal functioning (N ϭ 4 studies).
and yielded an overall effect size of 0.97 for general
Two recent studies examined the efficacy of long-
symptom improvement. The effect size increased to 1.51
term psychodynamic treatment. A meta-analysis re-
when the patients were assessed at long-term follow-up
ported in the Journal of the American Medical Associ-
(Ͼ 9 months posttreatment). In addition to change in
ation (Leichsenring & Rabung, 2008) compared long-
general symptoms, the meta-analysis reported an effect
term psychodynamic therapy (Ͼ 1 year or 50 sessions)
size of 0.81 for change in somatic symptoms, which
with shorter term therapies for the treatment of complex
increased to 2.21 at long-term follow-up; an effect size
mental disorders (defined as multiple or chronic mental
of 1.08 for change in anxiety ratings, which increased to
disorders, or personality disorders) and yielded an effect
1.35 at follow-up; and an effect size of 0.59 for change
size of 1.8 for overall outcome.8 The pretreatment to
in depressive symptoms, which increased to 0.98 at
posttreatment effect size was 1.03 for overall outcome,
follow-up.7 The consistent trend toward larger effect
which increased to 1.25 at long-term follow-up (p Ͻ
sizes at follow-up suggests that psychodynamic therapy
.01), an average of 23 months posttreatment. Effect sizes
sets in motion psychological processes that lead to on-
increased from treatment completion to follow-up for all
going change, even after therapy has ended.
five outcome domains assessed in the study (overall
A meta-analysis published in Archives of General Psy-
effectiveness, target problems, psychiatric symptoms,
chiatry included 17 high-quality randomized controlled trials
personality functioning, and social functioning). A sec-
of short-term (average of 21 sessions) psychodynamic therapy
ond meta-analysis, reported in the Harvard Review of
and reported an effect size of 1.17 for psychodynamic therapy
Psychiatry (de Maat, de Jonghe, Schoevers, & Dekker,
compared with controls (Leichsenring, Rabung, & Leibing,
2009), examined the effectiveness of long-term psy-
2004). The pretreatment to posttreatment effect size was 1.39,
chodynamic therapy (average of 150 sessions) for adult
which increased to 1.57 at long-term follow-up, which oc-
outpatients with a range of diagnoses. For patients with
curred an average of 13 months posttreatment. Translating
mixed/moderate pathology, the pretreatment to posttreat-
these effect sizes into percentage terms, the authors noted that
ment effect was 0.78 for general symptom improvement,
patients treated with psychodynamic therapy were “better off
which increased to 0.94 at long-term follow-up, an average of
with regard to their target problems than 92% of the patients
3.2 years posttreatment. For patients with severe personality
before therapy” (Leichsenring et al., 2004, p. 1213).
pathology, the pretreatment to posttreatment effect was 0.94,
A newly released meta-analysis examined the efficacy
which increased to 1.02 at long-term follow-up, an average of
of short-term psychodynamic therapy for somatic disorders
(Abbass, Kisely, & Kroenke, 2009). It included 23 studies
These meta-analyses represent the most recent and
involving 1,870 patients who suffered from a wide range of
methodologically rigorous evaluations of psychody-
somatic conditions (e.g., dermatological, neurological, car-
namic therapy. Especially noteworthy is the recurring
diovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal,
finding that the benefits of psychodynamic therapy not only
genitourinary, immunological). The study reported effectsizes of 0.69 for improvement in general psychiatric symp-toms and 0.59 for improvement in somatic symptoms.
5 More widely known in medicine than in psychology, the Cochrane
Among studies that reported data on health care utilization,
Library was created to promote evidence based practice and is considered
77.8% reported reductions in health care utilization that
a leader in methodological rigor for meta-analysis.
6 These included nonpsychotic symptom and behavior disorders
were due to psychodynamic therapy—a finding with po-
commonly seen in primary care and psychiatric services, for example,
tentially enormous implications for health care reform.
nonbipolar depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and somatoform dis-
A meta-analysis reported in the American Journal of
orders, often mixed with interpersonal or personality disorders (Abbass et
Psychiatry examined the efficacy of both psychodynamic
7 The meta-analysis computed effect sizes in a variety of ways. The
psychotherapy (14 studies) and CBT (11 studies) for person-
findings reported here are based on the single method that seemed most
ality disorders (Leichsenring & Leibing, 2003). The meta-
conceptually and statistically meaningful (in this case, a random effects
analysis reported pretreatment to posttreatment effect sizes
model, with a single outlier excluded). See the original source for more
using the longest term follow-up available. For psychody-
fine-grained analyses (Abbass et al., 2006).
namic therapy (mean length of treatment was 37 weeks), the
The atypical method used to compute this effect size may provide
an inflated estimate of efficacy, and the effect size may not be comparable
mean follow-up period was 1.5 years and the pretreatment to
to other effect sizes reported in this review (for discussion, see Thombs,
posttreatment effect size was 1.46. For CBT (mean length of
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
Illustrative Effect Sizes From Meta-Analyses of Treatment Outcome StudiesGeneral psychotherapy CBT and related therapies
CBT and behavior therapy, various disorders
CBT for depression, panic, and generalized
Dialectical behavior therapy, primarily for
Antidepressant medication
FDA-registered studies of antidepressants
Tricyclic antidepressants versus active placebo
Psychodynamic therapy
Various disorders, general symptom improvement
Various disorders, change in target problems
Somatic disorders, change in general psychiatric
Long-term psychodynamic therapy vs. shorter term
therapies for complex mental disorders, overall
Long-term psychoanalytic therapy, pretreatment to
a Median effect size across 18 meta-analyses (from Lipsey & Wilson, 1993, Table 1.1). b Median effect size across 23 meta-analyses (from Lipsey & Wilson, 1993,
Table 1.2). c Pretreatment to posttreatment (within-group) comparison.
endure but increase with time, a finding that has now
Studies supporting the efficacy of psychodynamic ther-
emerged from at least five independent meta-analyses (Ab-
apy span a range of conditions and populations. Randomized
bass et al., 2006; Anderson & Lambert, 1995; de Maat et
controlled trials support the efficacy of psychodynamic ther-
al., 2009; Leichsenring & Rabung, 2008; Leichsenring et
apy for depression, anxiety, panic, somatoform disorders,
al., 2004). In contrast, the benefits of other (nonpsychody-
eating disorders, substance-related disorders, and personality
namic) empirically supported therapies tend to decay over
disorders (Leichsenring, 2005; Milrod et al., 2007).
time for the most common disorders (e.g., depression,
Findings concerning personality disorders are partic-
generalized anxiety; de Maat, Dekker, Schoevers, & de
ularly intriguing. A recent study of patients with borderline
Jonghe, 2006; Gloaguen, Cottraux, Cucharet, & Blackburn,
personality disorder (Clarkin, Levy, Lenzenweger, & Kern-
1998; Hollon et al., 2005; Westen, Novotny, & Thompson-
berg, 2007) not only demonstrated treatment benefits that
equaled or exceeded those of another evidence-based treat-
Table 1 summarizes the meta-analytic findings de-
ment, dialectical behavior therapy (Linehan, 1993), but
scribed above and adds additional findings to provide fur-ther points of reference. Except as noted, effect sizes listedin the table are based on comparisons of treatment and
9 The exceptions to this pattern are specific anxiety conditions such as
control groups and reflect response at the completion of
panic disorder and simple phobia, for which short-term, manualized treat-
treatment (not long-term follow-up).
ments do appear to have lasting benefits (Westen et al., 2004).
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
also showed changes in underlying psychological mecha-
theoretical premises or the specific interventions that derive
nisms (intrapsychic processes) believed to mediate symp-
from them. For example, the available evidence indicates
tom change in borderline patients (specifically, changes in
that the mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy (CT)
reflective function and attachment organization; Levy et al.,
are not those presumed by the theory. Kazdin (2007),
2006). These intrapsychic changes occurred in patients
reviewing the empirical literature on mediators and mech-
who received psychodynamic therapy but not in patients
anisms of change in psychotherapy, concluded, “Perhaps
who received dialectical behavior therapy.
we can state more confidently now than before that what-
Such intrapsychic changes may account for long-term
ever may be the basis of changes with CT, it does not seem
treatment benefits. A newly released study showed endur-
to be the cognitions as originally proposed” (p. 8).
ing benefits of psychodynamic therapy five years after
There are also profound differences in the way ther-
treatment completion (and eight years after treatment ini-
apists practice, even therapists ostensibly providing the
tiation). At five-year follow-up, 87% of patients who re-
same treatment. What takes place in the clinical consulting
ceived “treatment as usual” continued to meet diagnostic
room reflects the qualities and style of the individual ther-
criteria for borderline personality disorder, compared with
apist, the individual patient, and the unique patterns of
13% of patients who received psychodynamic therapy
interaction that develop between them. Even in controlled
(Bateman & Fonagy, 2008). No other treatment for person-
studies designed to compare manualized treatments, thera-
ality pathology has shown such enduring benefits.
pists interact with patients in different ways, implement
These last findings must be tempered with the caveat
interventions differently, and introduce processes not spec-
that they rest on two studies and therefore cannot carry as
ified by the treatment manuals (Elkin et al., 1989). In some
much evidential weight as findings replicated in multiple
cases, investigators have had difficulty determining from
studies conducted by independent research teams. More
verbatim session transcripts which manualized treatment
generally, it must be acknowledged that there are far more
was being provided (Ablon & Jones, 2002).
empirical outcome studies of other treatments, notably
For these reasons, studies of therapy “brand names”
CBT, than of psychodynamic treatments. The discrepancy
can be highly misleading. Studies that look beyond brand
in sheer numbers of studies is traceable, in part, to the
names by examining session videotapes or transcripts may
indifference to empirical research of earlier generations of
reveal more about what is helpful to patients (Goldfried &
psychoanalysts, a failing that continues to haunt the field
Wolfe, 1996; Kazdin, 2007, 2008). Such studies indicate
and that contemporary investigators labor to address.
that the active ingredients of other therapies include unac-
A second caveat is that many psychodynamic outcome
studies have included patients with a range of symptoms
One method of studying what actually happens in
and conditions rather than focusing on specific diagnostic
therapy sessions makes use of the Psychotherapy Process
categories (e.g., those defined by diagnostic criteria speci-
Q-Sort (PQS; Jones, 2000). This instrument consists of 100
fied in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
variables that assess therapist technique and other aspects
Disorders [4th edition, DSM-IV; American Psychiatric As-
of the therapy process based on specific actions, behaviors,
sociation, 1994]). The extent to which this is a limitation is
and statements made during sessions. In a series of studies,
open to debate. A concern often raised about psychother-
blind raters scored the 100 PQS variables from archival,
apy efficacy studies is that they use highly selected and
verbatim session transcripts for hundreds of therapy hours
unrepresentative patient samples and, consequently, that
from outcome studies of both brief psychodynamic therapy
their findings do not generalize to real-world clinical prac-
and CBT (Ablon & Jones, 1998; Jones & Pulos, 1993).10
tice (e.g., Westen et al., 2004). Nor is there universal
In one study, the investigators asked panels of inter-
agreement that DSM–IV diagnostic categories define dis-
nationally recognized experts in psychoanalytic therapy
crete or homogeneous patient groups (given that psychiat-
and CBT to use the PQS to describe “ideally” conducted
ric comorbidity is the norm and that diagnosable com-
treatments (Ablon & Jones, 1998). On the basis of the
plaints are often embedded in personality syndromes; Blatt
expert ratings, the investigators constructed prototypes of
& Zuroff, 2005; Westen, Gabbard, & Blagov, 2006). Be
ideally conducted psychodynamic therapy and CBT. The
that as it may, an increasing number of studies of psy-
two prototypes differed considerably.
chodynamic treatments do focus on specific diagnoses
The psychodynamic prototype emphasized unstruc-
(e.g., Bateman & Fonagy, 2008; Clarkin et al., 2007; Cui-
tured, open-ended dialogue (e.g., discussion of fantasies
jpers, van Straten, Andersson, & van Oppen, 2008; Leich-
and dreams); identifying recurring themes in the patient’s
senring, 2001, 2005; Milrod et al., 2007).
experience; linking the patient’s feelings and perceptions topast experiences; drawing attention to feelings regarded by
A Rose by Another Name:
the patient as unacceptable (e.g., anger, envy, excitement);
Psychodynamic Process in Other
pointing out defensive maneuvers; interpreting warded-off
Therapies
The “active ingredients” of therapy are not necessarily
10 The cognitive therapy study was a randomized controlled trial for
those presumed by the theory or treatment model. For this
depression; the psychodynamic therapy studies were panel studies formixed disorders and for posttraumatic stress disorder, respectively. See
reason, randomized controlled trials that evaluate a therapy
the original source for more detailed descriptions (Ablon & Jones, 1998;
as a “package” do not necessarily provide support for its
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
or unconscious wishes, feelings, or ideas; focusing on the
(Stage 4), engages in an exploration of his or her inner experience
therapy relationship as a topic of discussion; and drawing
(Stage 5), and gains awareness of previously implicit feelings and
connections between the therapy relationship and other
meanings [emphasis added] (Stage 6). The highest stage (7) refers
to an ongoing process of in-depth self-understanding. (Caston-
The CBT prototype emphasized dialogue with a more
specific focus, with the therapist structuring the interaction
Especially noteworthy is the phrase “gains awareness
and introducing topics; the therapist functioning in a more
of previously implicit feelings and meanings.” The term
didactic or teacher-like manner; the therapist offering ex-
implicit refers, of course, to aspects of mental life that are
plicit guidance or advice; discussion of the patient’s treat-
not initially conscious. The construct measured by the scale
ment goals; explanation of the rationale behind the treat-
hearkens back to the earliest days of psychoanalysis and its
ment and techniques; focusing on the patient’s current life
central goal of making the unconscious conscious (Freud,
situation; focusing on cognitive themes such as thoughts
and belief systems; and discussion of tasks or activities
In this study of manualized cognitive therapy for
(“homework”) for the patient to attempt outside of therapy
depression, the following findings emerged: (a) Working
alliance predicted patient improvement on all outcome
In three sets of archival treatment records (one from a
measures; (b) psychodynamic process (“experiencing”)
study of cognitive therapy and two from studies of brief
predicted patient improvement on all outcome measures;
psychodynamic therapy), the researchers measured thera-
and (c) therapist adherence to the cognitive treatment
pists’ adherence to each therapy prototype without regard
model (i.e., focusing on distorted cognitions) predicted
to the treatment model the therapists believed they wereapplying (Ablon & Jones, 1998). poorer outcome. A subsequent study using different meth-
odology replicated the finding that interventions aimed at
the psychodynamic prototype predicted successful out-
cognitive change predicted poorer outcome (Hayes, Cas-
come in both psychodynamic and cognitive therapy. Ther-apist adherence to the CBT prototype showed little or no
tonguay, & Goldfried, 1996). However, discussion of in-
relation to outcome in either form of therapy. The findings
terpersonal relations and exploration of past experiences
replicated those of an earlier study that employed a differ-
with early caregivers— both core features of psychody-
ent methodology and also found that psychodynamic inter-
namic technique—predicted successful outcome.
ventions, not CBT interventions, predicted successful out-
These findings should not be interpreted as indicating
come in both cognitive and psychodynamic treatments
that cognitive techniques are harmful, and other studies
have reported positive relations between CBT technique
An independent team of investigators using different
and outcome (Feeley, DeRubeis, & Gelfand, 1999; Strunk,
research methods also found that psychodynamic methods
DeRubeis, Chiu, & Alvarez, 2007; Tang & DeRubeis,
predicted successful outcome in cognitive therapy (Caston-
1999). Qualitative analysis of the verbatim session tran-
guay, Goldfried, Wiser, Raue, & Hayes, 1996). The study
scripts suggested that the poorer outcomes associated with
assessed outcomes in cognitive therapy conducted accord-
cognitive interventions were due to implementation of the
ing to Beck’s treatment model (Beck, Rush, Shaw, &
cognitive treatment model in dogmatic, rigidly insensitive
Emery, 1979), and the findings had been reported as evi-
ways by certain of the therapists (Castonguay et al., 1996).
dence for the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression
(No school of therapy appears to have a monopoly on
dogmatism or therapeutic insensitivity. Certainly, the his-
Investigators measured three variables from verbatim
tory of psychoanalysis is replete with examples of dog-
transcripts of randomly selected therapy sessions in a sam-
matic excesses.) On the other hand, the findings do indicate
ple of 64 outpatients. One variable assessed quality of the
that the more effective therapists facilitated therapeutic
working alliance (the concept working alliance, or thera-
processes that have long been core, centrally defining fea-
peutic alliance, is now widely recognized and often con-
tures of psychoanalytic theory and practice.
sidered a nonspecific or “common” factor in many forms of
Other empirical studies have also demonstrated links
therapy; many do not realize that the concept comes di-
between psychodynamic methods and successful outcome,
rectly from psychoanalysis and has played a central role in
whether or not the investigators explicitly identified the
psychoanalytic theory and practice for over four decades;
methods as “psychodynamic” (e.g., Barber, Crits-Chris-
see Greenson, 1967; Horvath & Luborsky, 1993). The
toph, & Luborsky, 1996; Diener, Hilsenroth, & Wein-
second variable assessed therapist implementation of the
berger, 2007; Gaston, Thompson, Gallagher, Cournoyer, &
cognitive treatment model (i.e., addressing distorted cog-nitions believed to cause depressive affect). The third vari-
11 See the original source for more complete descriptions of the two
able, labeled experiencing, beautifully captures the essence
therapy prototypes (Ablon & Jones, 1998).
12 The study is one of the archival studies analyzed by Jones and his
associates (Ablon & Jones, 1998; Jones & Pulos, 1993). experiencing], the client talks about
13 Although the term “experiencing” derives from the humanistic
events, ideas, or others (Stage 1); refers to self but without
therapy tradition, the phenomenon assessed by the scale—a trajectory of
expressing emotions (Stage 2); or expresses emotions but only as
deepening self-exploration, leading to increased awareness of implicit or
they relate to external circumstances (Stage 3). At higher stages,
unconscious mental life—is the core defining feature of psychoanalysis
the client focuses directly on emotions and thoughts about self
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
Gagnon, 1998; Hayes & Strauss, 1998; Hilsenroth, Acker-
The Shedler–Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP;
man, Blagys, Baity, & Mooney, 2003; Høglend et al., 2008;
Shedler & Westen, 2007; Westen & Shedler, 1999a,
Norcross, 2002; Pos, Greenberg, Goldman, & Korman,
1999b) represents one method of assessing the kinds of
inner capacities and resources that psychotherapy may de-
The Flight of the Dodo
velop. The SWAP is a clinician-report (not-self report)instrument that assesses a broad range of personality pro-
The heading of this section is an allusion to what has come
cesses, both healthy and pathological. The instrument can
to be known in the psychotherapy research literature as the
be scored by clinicians of any theoretical orientation and
Dodo bird verdict. After reviewing the psychotherapy out-
has demonstrated high reliability and validity relative to a
come literatures of the time, Rosenzweig (1936), and sub-
wide range of criterion measures (Shedler & Westen, 2007;
sequently Luborsky, Singer, and Luborsky (1975), reached
Westen & Shedler, 2007). The SWAP includes an empir-
the conclusion of the Dodo bird in Alice in Wonderland:
ically derived Healthy Functioning Index comprising the
“Everybody has won, and all must have prizes.” Outcomes
items listed in Table 2, which define and operationalize
for different therapies were surprisingly equivalent, and no
mental health as consensually understood by clinical prac-
form of psychotherapy proved superior to any other. In the
titioners across theoretical orientations (Westen & Shedler,
rare instances when studies found differences between ac-
1999a, 1999b). Many forms of treatment, including medi-
tive treatments, the findings virtually always favored the
cations, may be effective in alleviating acute psychiatric
preferred treatment of the investigators (the investigator
symptoms, at least in the short run. However, not all
allegiance effect; Luborsky et al., 1999).
therapies aim at changing underlying psychological pro-
Subsequent research has done little to alter the Dodo
cesses such as those assessed by the SWAP. (A working
bird verdict (Lambert & Ogles, 2004; Wampold, Minami,
version of the SWAP, which generates and graphs T scores
Baskin, & Callen Tierney, 2002). For example, studies that
for a wide range of personality traits and disorders, can be
have directly compared CBT with short-term psychody-
namic therapy for depression have failed to show greater
Researchers, including psychodynamically oriented
efficacy for CBT over psychodynamic therapy or vice versa
researchers, have yet to conduct compelling outcome stud-
(Cuijpers et al., 2008; Leichsenring, 2001). Leichsenring
ies that assess changes in inner capacities and resources,
(2001) noted that both treatments appeared to qualify as
but two studies raise intriguing possibilities and suggest
empirically supported therapies according to the criteria
directions for future research. One is a single case study of
specified by the American Psychological Association’s Di-
a woman diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
vision 12 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of
who was assessed with the SWAP by independent asses-
Psychological Procedures (1995; Chambless et al., 1998).
sors (not the treating clinician) at the beginning of treat-
Some of the studies compared psychodynamic treatments
ment and again after two years of psychodynamic therapy
of only eight sessions’ duration, which most practitioners
(Lingiardi, Shedler, & Gazzillo, 2006). In addition to
would consider inadequate, with 16-session CBT treat-
meaningful decreases in SWAP scales that measure psy-
ments. Even in these studies, outcomes were comparable
chopathology, the patient’s SWAP scores showed an in-
(Barkham et al., 1996; Shapiro et al., 1994).
creased capacity for empathy and greater sensitivity to
There are many reasons why outcome studies may fail to
others’ needs and feelings; increased ability to recognize
show differences between treatments even if important differ-
alternative viewpoints, even when emotions ran high; in-
ences really exist. Others have discussed the limitations and
creased ability to comfort and soothe herself; increased
unexamined assumptions of current research methods (Gold-
recognition and awareness of the consequences of her
fried & Wolfe, 1996; Norcross, Beutler, & Levant, 2005;
actions; increased ability to express herself verbally; more
Westen et al., 2004). Here I focus on one salient limitation: the
accurate and balanced perceptions of people and situations;
mismatch between what psychodynamic therapy aims to ac-
a greater capacity to appreciate humor; and, perhaps most
complish and what outcome studies typically measure.
important, she had come to terms with painful past expe-
As noted earlier, the goals of psychodynamic therapy
riences and had found meaning in them and grown from
include, but extend beyond, alleviation of acute symptoms.
them. The patient’s score on the SWAP Healthy Function-
Psychological health is not merely the absence of symp-
ing Index increased by approximately two standard devia-
toms; it is the positive presence of inner capacities and
resources that allow people to live life with a greater sense
A second study used the SWAP to compare 26 pa-
of freedom and possibility. Symptom-oriented outcome
tients beginning psychoanalysis with 26 patients complet-
measures commonly used in outcome studies (e.g., the
ing psychoanalysis (Cogan & Porcerelli, 2005). The latter
Beck Depression Inventory [Beck, Ward, Mendelson,
group not only had significantly lower scores for SWAP
Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961] or the Hamilton Rating Scale for
items assessing depression, anxiety, guilt, shame, feelings
Depression [Hamilton, 1960]) do not attempt to assess such
of inadequacy, and fears of rejection but significantly
inner capacities (Blatt & Auerbach, 2003; Kazdin, 2008).
higher scores for SWAP items assessing inner strengths
Possibly, the Dodo bird verdict reflects a failure of re-
and capacities (see Table 2). These included greater satis-
searchers, psychodynamic and nonpsychodynamic alike, to
faction in pursuing long-term goals, enjoyment of chal-
adequately assess the range of phenomena that can change
lenges and pleasure in accomplishments, ability to utilize
talents and abilities, contentment in life’s activities, empa-
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
Methodological limitations preclude drawing causal
conclusions from these studies, but they suggest that psy-
Definition of Mental Health: Items From the Shedler–
chodynamic therapy may not only alleviate symptoms but
Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP–200; Shedler
also develop inner capacities and resources that allow a
richer and more fulfilling life. Measures such as the SWAPcould be incorporated in future randomized controlled tri-
● Is able to use his/her talents, abilities, and energy
als, scored by independent assessors blind to treatment
condition, and used to assess such outcomes. Whether or
● Enjoys challenges; takes pleasure in accomplishing things.
not all forms of therapy aim for such outcomes, or re-
● Is capable of sustaining a meaningful love relationship
searchers study them, they are clearly the outcomes desired
characterized by genuine intimacy and caring.
by many people who seek psychotherapy. Perhaps this is
● Finds meaning in belonging and contributing to a larger
why psychotherapists, irrespective of their own theoretical
community (e.g., organization, church, neighborhood).
orientations, tend to choose psychodynamic psychotherapy
● Is able to find meaning and fulfillment in guiding,
Discussion
● Is empathic; is sensitive and responsive to other people’s
One intent of this article was to provide an overview ofsome basic principles of psychodynamic therapy for read-
● Is able to assert him/herself effectively and appropriately
ers who have not been exposed to them or who have notheard them presented by a contemporary practitioner who
● Appreciates and responds to humor.
takes them seriously and uses them clinically. Another was
● Is capable of hearing information that is emotionally
to show that psychodynamic treatments have considerable
threatening (i.e., that challenges cherished beliefs,
perceptions, and self-perceptions) and can use and
empirical support. The empirical literature on psychody-
namic treatments does, however, have important limita-tions. First, the number of randomized controlled trials for
● Appears to have come to terms with painful experiences
from the past; has found meaning in and grown from
other forms of psychotherapy, notably CBT, is consider-
ably larger than that for psychodynamic therapy, perhapsby an order of magnitude. Many of these trials—specifi-
● Is articulate; can express self well in words.
cally, the newer and better-designed trials—are more meth-
● Has an active and satisfying sex life.
odologically rigorous (although some of the newest psy-
● Appears comfortable and at ease in social situations.
chodynamic randomized controlled trials, e.g., that of
● Generally finds contentment and happiness in life’s
Clarkin et al., 2007, also meet the highest standards of
methodological rigor). In too many cases, characteristics of
● Tends to express affect appropriate in quality and
patient samples have been too loosely specified, treatment
methods have been inadequately specified and monitored,
● Has the capacity to recognize alternative viewpoints,
and control conditions have not been optimal (e.g., using
even in matters that stir up strong feelings.
wait-list controls or “treatment as usual” rather than activealternative treatments—a limitation that applies to research
● Has moral and ethical standards and strives to live up to
on empirically supported therapies more generally). Theseand other limitations of the psychodynamic research liter-
● Is creative; is able to see things or approach problems in
ature must be addressed by future research. My intent is notto compare treatments or literatures but to review the
● Tends to be conscientious and responsible.
existing empirical evidence supporting psychodynamic
● Tends to be energetic and outgoing.
treatments and therapy processes, which is often underap-
● Is psychologically insightful; is able to understand self and
others in subtle and sophisticated ways.
In writing this article, I could not help being struck by
● Is able to find meaning and satisfaction in the pursuit of
a number of ironies. One is that academicians who dismiss
psychodynamic approaches, sometimes in vehement tones,
● Is able to form close and lasting friendships characterized
often do so in the name of science. Some advocate a
by mutual support and sharing of experiences.
science of psychology grounded exclusively in the exper-imental method. Yet the same experimental method yieldsfindings that support both psychodynamic concepts (e.g.,Westen, 1998) and treatments. In light of the accumulation
thy for others, interpersonal assertiveness and effective-
of empirical findings, blanket assertions that psychody-
ness, ability to hear and benefit from emotionally threaten-
namic approaches lack scientific support (e.g., Barlow &
ing information, and resolution of past painful experiences.
Durand, 2005; Crews, 1996; Kihlstrom, 1999) are no
For the group completing psychoanalysis, the mean score
longer defensible. Presentations that equate psychoanal-
on the SWAP Healthy Functioning Index was one standard
ysis with dated concepts that last held currency in the
psychoanalytic community in the early 20th century are
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
similarly misleading; they are at best uninformed and at
Abbass, A., Kisely, S., & Kroenke, K. (2009). Short-term psychodynamic
psychotherapy for somatic disorders: Systematic review and meta-
A second irony is that relatively few clinical practi-
analysis of clinical trials. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 265–274. doi:10.1159/000228247
tioners, including psychodynamic practitioners, are famil-
Ablon, J. S., & Jones, E. E. (1998). How expert clinicians’ prototypes of
iar with the research reviewed in this article. Many psy-
an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cog-
chodynamic clinicians and educators seem ill-prepared to
nitive-behavioral therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 71– 83. doi:
respond to challenges from evidence-oriented colleagues,
Ablon, J. S., & Jones, E. E. (2002). Validity of controlled clinical trials of
students, utilization reviewers, or policymakers, despite the
psychotherapy: Findings from the NIMH Treatment of Depression
accumulation of high-quality empirical evidence support-
Collaborative Research Program. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159,
ing psychodynamic concepts and treatments. Just as anti-
psychoanalytic sentiment may have impeded dissemination
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical
of this research in academic circles, distrust of academic
manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, E. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1995). Short-term dynamically
research methods may have impeded dissemination in psy-
oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychol-
choanalytic circles (see Bornstein, 2001). Such attitudes are
ogy Review, 15, 503–514. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(95)00027-M
changing, but they cannot change quickly enough.
Barber, J., Crits-Christoph, P., & Luborsky, L. (1996). Effects of therapist
Researchers also share responsibility for this state
adherence and competence on patient outcome in brief dynamic ther-apy.
of affairs (Shedler, 2006b). Many investigators take for
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 619 – 622.
granted that clinical practitioners are the intended con-
Barkham, M., Rees, A., Shapiro, D. A., Stiles, W. B., Agnew, R. M.,
sumers of clinical research (e.g., Task Force on Promo-
Halstead, J., . . . Harrington, V. M. G. (1996). Outcomes of time-limited
tion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures,
psychotherapy in applied settings: Replication of the second Sheffield
1995), but many of the psychotherapy outcome studies
Psychotherapy Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,64, 1079 –1085. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.5.1079
and meta-analyses reviewed for this article are clearly
Barlow, D. H., & Durand, V. M. (2005). Abnormal psychology: An
not written for practitioners. On the contrary, they are
integrative approach (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
densely complex and technical and often seem written
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2008). 8-year follow-up of patients treated for
primarily for other psychotherapy researchers—a case of
borderline personality disorder: Mentalization-based treatment versustreatment as usual.
one hand writing for the other. As an experienced re-
American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 631– 638.
search methodologist and psychometrician, I must admit
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive
that deciphering some of these articles required hours of
therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
study and more than a few consultations with colleagues
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961).
who conduct and publish outcome research. I am unsure
An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychia-try, 4, 561–571.
how the average knowledgeable clinical practitioner
Blagys, M. D., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2000). Distinctive activities of
could navigate the thicket of specialized statistical meth-
short-term psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy: A review of
ods, clinically unrepresentative samples, investigator al-
the comparative psychotherapy process literature. Clinical Psychology:
legiance effects, inconsistent methods of reporting re-
Science and Practice, 7, 167–188.
Blagys, M. D., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2002). Distinctive activities of
sults, and inconsistent findings across multiple outcome
cognitive– behavioral therapy: A review of the comparative psychother-
variables of uncertain clinical relevance. If clinical prac-
apy process literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 671–706. doi:
titioners are indeed the intended “consumers” of psycho-
therapy research, then psychotherapy research needs to
Blatt, S. J., & Auerbach, J. S. (2003). Psychodynamic measures of
be more consumer relevant (Westen, Novotny, &
therapeutic change. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 268 –307.
Blatt, S. J., & Zuroff, D. C. (2005). Empirical evaluation of the assump-
tions in identifying evidence based treatments in mental health. Clinical
With the caveats noted above, the available evidence
Psychology Review, 25, 459 – 486. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.001
indicates that effect sizes for psychodynamic therapies are
Bornstein, R. (1988). Psychoanalysis in the undergraduate curriculum:
as large as those reported for other treatments that have
The treatment of psychoanalytic theory in abnormal psychology texts.
been actively promoted as “empirically supported” and
Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5, 83–93. doi:10.1037/h0085122
Bornstein, R. (1995, Spring). Psychoanalysis in the undergraduate curric-
“evidence based.” It indicates that the (often unacknowl-
ulum: An agenda for the psychoanalytic researcher. Bulletin of the
edged) “active ingredients” of other therapies include tech-
Psychoanalytic Research Society, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.
niques and processes that have long been core, centrally
defining features of psychodynamic treatment. Finally, the
Bornstein, R. (2001). The impending death of psychoanalysis. Psychoan-alytic Psychology, 18, 3–20. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.18.1.3
evidence indicates that the benefits of psychodynamic treat-
Burum, B. A., & Goldfried, M. R. (2007). The centrality of emotion to
ment are lasting and not just transitory and appear to extend
psychological change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14,
well beyond symptom remission. For many people, psy-
407– 413. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2007.00100.x
chodynamic therapy may foster inner resources and capac-
Castonguay, L. G., Goldfried, M. R., Wiser, S. L., Raue, P. J., & Hayes,
A. M. (1996). Predicting the effect of cognitive therapy for depression:
ities that allow richer, freer, and more fulfilling lives.
A study of unique and common factors. Journal of Consulting andClinical Psychology, 64, 497–504. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.497
REFERENCES
Chambless, D. L., Baker, M., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun,
K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., . . . Woody, S. R. (1998). Update on empir-
Abbass, A. A., Hancock, J. T., Henderson, J., & Kisely, S. (2006).
ically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51(1), 3–16.
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disor-
Churchill, R., Hunot, V., Corney, R., Knapp, M., McGuire, H., Tylee, A.,
ders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, Article No.
& Wessely, S. (2001). A systematic review of controlled trials of the
CD004687. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004687.pub3
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
for depression. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 1–173. doi:10.3310/
Hayes, A., & Strauss, J. (1998). Dynamic systems theory as a paradigm
for the study of cognitive change in psychotherapy: An application of
Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2007).
cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: A mul-
Psychology, 66, 939 –947. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.6.939
tiwave study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 922–928. doi:
Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of indepen-
dent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490 – 499. doi:10.1037/
Cogan, R., & Porcerelli, J. H. (2005). Clinician reports of personality
pathology of patients beginning and patients ending psychoanalysis.
Hilsenroth, M., Ackerman, S., Blagys, M., Baity, M., & Mooney, M. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 78,
(2003). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: An
evaluation of statistical, clinically significant, and technique specific
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
change. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 349 –357. doi:
Crews, F. (1996). The verdict on Freud. Psychological Science, 7, 63– 67.
Høglend, P., Bøgwald, K.-P., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Ulberg, R., Sjaastad,
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., Andersson, G., & van Oppen, P. (2008).
M. C., . . . Johansson, P. (2008). Transference interpretations in dy-
Psychotherapy for depression in adults: A meta-analysis of comparative
namic psychotherapy: Do they really yield sustained effects? American
outcome studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76,Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 763–771.
Hollon, S. D., DeRubeis, R. J., Evans, M. D., Wiemer, M. J., Garvey,
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Warmerdam, L. (2007). Behavioral
M. J., Grove, M. W., & Tuasn, V. B. (1992). Cognitive therapy and
activation treatments of depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychol-
pharmacotherapy for depression: Singly and in combination. Archivesogy Review, 27, 318 –326. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.11.001
of General Psychiatry, 49, 774 –781.
de Maat, S., Dekker, J., Schoevers, R., & de Jonghe, F. (2006). Relative
Hollon, S. D., DeRubeis, R. J., Shelton, R. C., Amsterdam, J. D.,
efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of
Salomon, R. M., O’Reardon, J. P., . . . Gallop, R. (2005). Prevention of
depression: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 562–572.
relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to
severe depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 417– 422.
de Maat, S., de Jonghe, F., Schoevers, R., & Dekker, J. (2009). The
Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic
effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: A systematic review
alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychol-
of empirical studies. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 17, 1–23. doi:
ogy, 61, 561–573. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.561
Jones, E. E. (2000). Therapeutic action: A guide to psychoanalytic ther-
Diener, M. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., & Weinberger, J. (2007). Therapist affect
apy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
focus and patient outcomes in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-
Jones, E. E., & Pulos, S. M. (1993). Comparing the process in psychody-
analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 936 –941. doi:10.1176/
namic and cognitive behavioral therapies. Journal of Consulting andClinical Psychology, 61, 306 –316. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.61.2.306
Elkin, I., Shea, T., Watkins, J. T., Imber, S. D., Sotsky, S. M., Collins,
Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psycho-
J. F., . . . Parloff, M. B. (1989). National Institutes of Mental Health
therapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27.
Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Archives of
doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432
General Psychiatry, 46, 971–982.
Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New op-
Feeley, M., DeRubeis, R. J., & Gelfand, L. A. (1999). The temporal
portunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowl-
relation of adherence and alliance to symptom change in cognitive
edge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146 –
therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,67, 578 –582. doi:10.1037/0022-066X.67.4.578
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1999). A tumbling ground for whimsies? Contemporary
Freud, S. (1962). Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defence. In
Psychology, 44, 376 –378. doi:10.1037/002604
J. Strachey (Ed. and trans.), The standard edition of the complete
Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of
psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3, pp. 157–185). London,
psychotherapy. In M. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook
England: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1896)
of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 139 –193). New
Gabbard, G. O. (2004). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A basictext. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Leichsenring, F. (2001). Comparative effects of short-term psychody-
Gaston, L., Thompson, L., Gallagher, D., Cournoyer, L., & Gagnon, R.
namic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression: A
(1998). Alliance, technique, and their interactions in predicting out-
meta-analytic approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 401– 419.
come of behavioral, cognitive, and brief dynamic therapy. Psychother-
Leichsenring, F. (2005). Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies
apy Research, 8, 190 –209. doi:10.1080/10503309812331332307
effective? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 841– 868.
Gloaguen, V., Cottraux, J., Cucherat, M., & Blackburn, I. (1998). A
Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychody-
meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy in depressed patients.
namic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of
Journal of Affective Disorders, 49, 59 –72.
personality disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychia-
Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1996). Psychotherapy practice and
research: Repairing a strained alliance. American Psychologist, 51,
Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psy-
1007–1016. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1007
chodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American
Greenson, R. R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis.Medical Association, 300, 1551–1565.
New York, NY: International Universities Press.
Leichsenring, F., Rabung, S., & Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of
Haby, M. M., Donnelly, M., Corry, J., & Vos, T. (2006). Cognitive
short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disor-
behavioural therapy for depression, panic disorder and generalized
ders: A meta-analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1208 –1216.
anxiety disorder: A meta-regression of factors that may predict out-
Levy, K. N., Meehan, K. B., Kelly, K. M., Reynoso, J. S., Weber, M.,
come. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 9 –19.
Clarkin, J. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Change in attachment patterns
Hamilton, M. A. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neu-
and reflective function in a randomized control trial of transference
rology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56 – 61. doi:10.1136/
focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Journal ofConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 1027–1040. doi:10.1037/
Hansell, J. (2005). Writing an undergraduate textbook: An analyst’s
strange journey. Psychologist–Psychoanalyst, 24(4), 37–38. Retrieved
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline
from http://www.division39.org/pdfs/PsychPsychoanalyst1004c.pdf
personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. M., Castonguay, L. G., & Goldfried, M. R. (1996). Effective-
Lingiardi, V., Shedler, J., & Gazzillo, F. (2006). Assessing personality
ness of targeting the vulnerability factors of depression in cognitive
change in psychotherapy with the SWAP-200: A case study. Journal of
therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 623– 627. Personality Assessment, 86, 23–32.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological,
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-
Startup, M. (1994). Effects of treatment duration and severity of de-
analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209. doi:10.1037/0003-
pression on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral and psychody-
namic-interpersonal psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thou-
Psychology, 62, 522–534. doi:10.1037/0022-066X.62.3.522
Shedler, J. (2006a). That was then, this is now: Psychoanalytic psycho-
Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D. A., Rosenthal, R., Krause, E. D.,
therapy for the rest of us. Retrieved from http://psychsystems.net/
Johnson, S., . . . Schweizer, E. (1999). The researcher’s own therapy
allegiances: A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clin-
Shedler, J. (2006b). Why the scientist–practitioner schism won’t go away. ical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95–106. doi:10.1093/
The General Psychologist, 41(2), 9 –10. Retrieved from http://
Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. (1975). Comparative studies of
Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2007). The Shedler–Westen Assessment Pro-
psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995–1008.
cedure (SWAP): Making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful.
McWilliams, N. (2004). Psychoanalytic psychotherapy: A practitioner’sJournal of Personality Assessment, 89, 41–55. guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of
Messer, S. B., & Abbass, A. A. (in press). Evidence-based psychodynamic
psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
therapy with personality disorders. In J. Magnavita (Ed.), Evidence-
Strunk, D. R., DeRubeis, R. J., Chiu, A. W., & Alvarez, J. (2007). based treatment of personality dysfunction: Principles, methods and
Patients’ competence in and performance of cognitive therapy skills:
processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Relation to the reduction of relapse risk following treatment for depres-
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies,
sion. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 523–530.
R. R., . . . Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological
assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist,
Tang, T., & DeRubeis, R. (1999). Sudden gains and critical session in
56, 128 –165. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.128
cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and
Milrod, B., Leon, A. C., Busch, F., Rudden, M., Schwalberg, M., Clarkin,
Clinical Psychology, 67, 894 –904. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.894
J., . . . Shear, M. K. (2007). A randomized control trial of psychoana-
Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures.
lytic psychotherapy for panic disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry,
(1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated treat-
164, 265–272. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.164.2.265
ments: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48(1),
Moncrieff, J., Wessely, S., & Hardy, R. (2004). Active placebos versus
antidepressants for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-
Thombs, B. D., Bassel, M., & Jewett, L. R. (2009). Analyzing effective-
views, Issue 1, Article No. CD003012. doi:10.1002/14651858.
ness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of the Amer-ican Medical Association, 301, 930.
Norcross, J. C. (Ed.). (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work:
Turner, E. H., Matthews, A. M., Linardatos, E., Tell, R. A., & Rosenthal,
Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York, NY:
R. (2008). Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence
Norcross, J. C. (2005). The psychotherapist’s own psychotherapy: Edu-
New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 252–260.
cating and developing psychologists.
Vocisano, C., Klein, D. N., Arnow, B., Rivera, C., Blalock, J. A., Roth-
American Psychologist, 60, 840 –
baum, B., . . . Thase, M. E. (2004). Therapist variables that predict
Norcross, J. C., Beutler, L. E., & Levant, R. F. (Eds.). (2005).
change in psychotherapy with chronically depressed outpatients. Psy-chotherapy, 41, 255–265. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.41.3.255
based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the funda-
Wampold, B. E., Minami, T., Baskin, T. W., & Callen Tierney, S. (2002). mental questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Associa-tion.
A meta-(re)analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus “other
Öst, L. G. (2008). Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A
therapies” for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 68, 159 –165.
systematic review and meta-analysis.
Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a
psychodynamically informed psychological science. apy, 46, 296 –321. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.005
Pos, A. E., Greenberg, L. S., Goldman, R. N., & Korman, L. M. (2003). Bulletin, 124, 333–371. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.333
Emotional processing during experiential treatment of depression. Jour-
Westen, D., Gabbard, G., & Blagov, P. (2006). Back to the future:
nal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 1007–1016. doi:
Personality structure as a context for psychopathology. In R. F. Krueger
& J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 335–384).
Redmond, J., & Shulman, M. (2008). Access to psychoanalytic ideas in
American undergraduate institutions. Journal of the American Psycho-
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The
analytic Association, 56, 391– 408. doi:10.1177/0003065108318639
empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assump-
Robinson, L. A., Berman, J. S., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1990). Psychotherapy
tions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological
for the treatment of depression: A comprehensive review of controlled
Bulletin, 130, 631– 663. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631
outcome research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 30 – 49. doi:10.1037/
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2005). EBP
EST: Reply to Crits-Christoph et al. (2005). and Weisz et al. (2005).
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. New-
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent devel-
Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999a). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 1:
opments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review
Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. of Psychology, 52, 59 – 82. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 258 –272.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research:
Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999b). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 2:
Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of
Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods
personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 273–285.
of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412– 415.
Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (2007). Personality diagnosis with the Shedler–
(Reprinted in Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 2002, 12, 5–9.
Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Integrating clinical and statis-
tical measurement and prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
Shapiro, D. A., Barkham, M., Rees, A., Hardy, G. E., Reynolds, S., &
116, 810 – 822. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.810
February–March 2010 ● American Psychologist
Calendario Liturgico da Domenica 25 marzo a Domenica 1 aprile Parrocchia di Voltabarozzo www.voltabarozzo.it Domenica 25 marzo 2012 SS. Messe ore 7.30 - 8.45 - 10.00 - 11.15 - 18.30 Domenica 25 marzo 5° Domenica di Quaresima ore 8.45 Benetton Eugenio, Bertocco Teresa Se il chicco di grano caduto in terra non produce molto frutto. Il centro della frase non è il mor
Nya riktlinjer från WFSBP vid behandling av generaliserat ångestsyndrom (GAD) Nya riktlinjer från World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) rekommenderar Lyrica (pregabalin) som förstahandsval för behandling av generaliserat ångestsyndrom (GAD) . Mellan 5 och 8 procent av befolkningen beräknas någon gång i livet drabbas av GAD2, ett vanligt och långvarigt psykia