Microsoft word - barbiturates in procedural sedation.doc
Drug Class Review
Sedative Hypnotic Barbiturates in Procedural Sedation
Secobarbital (Seconal®) Thiopental (Pentothal®)
Review prepared by: Melissa Archer, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Gary Oderda, PharmD, MPH, Professor University of Utah College of Pharmacy Copyright 2012 by University of Utah College of Pharmacy Salt Lake City, Utah. All rights reserved.
Table of Contents:
Executive Summary . 3
Introduction. 5 Disease Overview
Table 1. Comparison of Barbiturate Agents . 6 Pharmacology
Clinical Efficacy . 8
Are there patient subgroups for which one of the barbiturates is more effective or associated
Adverse Drug Reactions . 9
How does the safety of the barbiturates compare with each other?. 9
There are nine barbiturate agents currently available for use in the United States:
amobarbital, butabarbital, butalbital, methohexital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, primidone,
secobarbital, and thiopental. Barbiturates are referred to as sedative-hypnotic agents and have a
number of different therapeutic uses including treatment of: anxiety, headache, insomnia, seizure
disorders, and for preoperative sedation or general anesthesia. This review focuses on barbiturate
use in procedural sedation/anesthesia. Four of the nine available barbiturates are available in oral
formulations and are approved for the treatment of insomnia: amobarbital, methohexital,
secobarbital, and thiopental.
Surgical procedures require a sedative agent or anesthetic which
produces changes in the patient’s perception resulting in an anesthetic state. Procedural
anesthesia is usually carried out by a general anesthetic and adjunctive agents. General
anesthetics are parental or inhaled and can produce anesthesia within a single circulation time.
Anesthetic adjuncts augment anesthesia and allow for lower doses of the general anesthetic to
reduce side effects. Barbiturates may be used for general anesthesia. The barbiturates most
frequently used in the procedural sedation are thiopental and methohexital.
No comparative clinical trials evaluating the barbiturates in procedural
sedation are available. Some placebo-controlled evidence is available. According to the data,
barbiturate agents are more effective than placebo. Many trials comparing the barbiturates to
propofol or benzodiazepines demonstrate similar sedative efficacy but higher rates of adverse
events for the barbiturate treatment groups.
Clinical evidence evaluating the use of barbiturates in pediatrics,
geriatric patients, or patients with a history of substance abuse is available. Barbiturate use in
neonates, infants, and children requires special care because of the differences in
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics in these patient populations. Older adults
are at increased risk of experiencing adverse events with barbiturate use as a result of the
potentially reduced ability to metabolize and remove the drug. Patients with a history of
substance abuse are also at an increased risk for inappropriate use of the drug. Overall, evidence
suggests barbiturate use should be avoided in these patient populations.
Adverse Drug Reactions:
The barbiturates are associated with many, potentially serious adverse
events. The most common drug-related adverse event reported with barbiturate use is CNS
depression. Short-term administration of barbiturates has little to no effect on the hepatic or renal
systems. Barbiturate agents are highly toxic in acute overdose and may result in death. Many
drug interactions are associated with the barbiturate agents because they can potentiate sedation
of other agents, competitively inhibit the metabolism of some drugs, or increase the rate of
hepatic clearance of some drugs. Barbiturates are contraindicated in patient with dyspnea or
airway obstruction and porphyria and should be used with caution in patients with severe liver or
The barbiturate agents are used as general anesthetics in procedural sedation.
Barbiturates have narrow therapeutic indexes and their use is limited. The barbiturate agents
indicated in procedural sedation/anesthesia include amobarbital, methohexital, secobarbital, and
thiopental. No comparative clinical trials or meta-analyses evaluating the oral barbiturate agents
in procedural sedation are available for evaluation. Some placebo-controlled evidence suggests
barbiturate agents are more effective than placebo. Barbiturate use should be avoided in neonatal
and geriatric patient populations. The barbiturate agents are associated with many, potentially
serious adverse events, including CNS depression. Barbiturate agents are highly toxic in acute
overdose and frequently result in death. Overall, clinical evidence is limited and use of
barbiturate agents in procedural sedation is declining.
A number of pharmacologic agents belong to the drug class referred to as sedative-
hypnotic agents. Sedative-hypnotic agents work to induce a calming or sedating effect by depressing the central nervous system (CNS).1 Sedative-hypnotic agents available in the United States include barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and some newer anti-insomnia agents with unique chemical structures. This review focuses on barbiturates. Nine oral and parenteral barbiturate agents are currently available for use in the United States: amobarbital, butabarbital, butalbital, methohexital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, primidone, secobarbital, and thiopental.2-4 Table 1 compares all of the barbiturate agents.
Barbiturates have been around since the early 1900s and were once used extensively as
sedative-hypnotic drugs.5 In the late 1950’s, the introduction of the new, safer benzodiazepine agents led to a steep decline in barbiturate use.5 Today, except for a few specialized uses (neonatal seizure disorder or anesthesia), the barbiturates are rarely used.3-5 Barbiturates are available in oral, intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) formulations and have a number of different therapeutic uses including treatment of: anxiety disorders, headache, insomnia, seizure disorders, and for preoperative sedation or general anesthesia.3, 4 This review will focus on barbiturate use in procedural sedation/anesthesia. Four of the nine available barbiturates are approved for the treatment of insomnia: amobarbital, methohexital, secobarbital, and thiopental.
Surgical procedures usually require an immobilized patient who experience amnesia for
the procedure.6 Amnesia for a surgical procedure is accomplished by a sedative agent or anesthetic which produces changes in the patient’s behavior or perception resulting in an anesthetic state. These changes in behavior may include amnesia, absence of psychological or autonomic responses to noxious stimulation, analgesia, and/or unconsciousness. General anesthetics are usually parental or inhaled and can produce anesthesia within a single circulation time. Blood concentration levels then fall rapidly as the drug is redistributed out of the CNS and back into the blood. The characteristics of a successful anesthetic include one which produces a state of anesthesia, minimizes any indirect/adverse effects, maintains physiological homeostasis, and improves postoperative outcomes.6
Procedural anesthesia is usually carried out by a general anesthetic and adjunctive
agents.6 General anesthetic agents include: barbiturates, propofol, etomidate, ketamine, and a number of inhalation anesthetics.3, 4 A general anesthetic is usually accompanied by an anesthetic adjunct to augment anesthesia and allow for lower doses of the general anesthetic to reduce side effects. Adjunct agents include: benzodiazepines, alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents.3, 4 Barbiturates are not frequently used anesthetics because of their adverse event profiles.7 Barbiturates have slow elimination and large volumes of distribution which can result in unconsciousness lasting several days.6 When used, the barbiturates most frequently used in procedural sedation are thiopental and methohexital.6, 7 Amobarbital and secobarbital may also be used but much less frequently.6
Table 1. Comparison of Barbiturate Agents3, 4
Dose Range (mg),
Oral liquid: 50mg/325mg/40mg per 15 mL (480 mL) Oral tablet: 50 mg/325 mg/40 mg, 50mg/500mg/40mg, 50mg/750mg/40mg
maintenance dose; usual dose: 750-1500 mg/day divided
agent or in the short-term treatment of insomnia
The barbiturate agents work by enhancing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)
activity, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS, by binding to the barbiturate site at the GABA-receptor complex.3, 4 This binding interferes with transmission of impulses from the thalamus to the cortex of the brain resulting in depressed CNS activity. All barbiturate agents exert similar clinical effects but differences in their pharmacokinetic profiles result in variations in therapeutic uses and indications.3, 4
A literature search was conducted to identify articles addressing each key
question, searching the MEDLINE database (1950 – 2012), the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of review articles. For the clinical efficacy section, only clinical trials published in English and indexed on MEDLINE prior to 4/2012, evaluating efficacy of barbiturate agents in procedural sedation. Trials evaluating the barbiturates as monotherapy or combination therapy where adjunctive medications remained constant throughout the trial are included. Trials comparing monotherapy with combination regimens are excluded. The following reports were excluded (note: some were excluded for more than 1 reason):
• Individual clinical trials which evaluated endpoints other than reduction of symptoms,
such as Wada (language/memory) tests8-11, anxiety management12, seizure control13, product formulations14, 15 or behavior criteria.16
• Individual trials comparing barbiturates in dose-finding studies or in healthy
• Individual clinical trials evaluating barbiturate agents or formulations not currently
available in the US or clinical trials without access to the full article.
No comparative clinical trials or meta-analyses evaluating the oral barbiturate
agents in procedural sedation/anesthesia are available for evaluation. Lack of comparative clinical data for barbiturates may stem from their approval for use came before 1962 when the Kefauver-Harris Drug Control Act required all drugs be proven both efficacious as well as safe. Some placebo-controlled trials evaluating the barbiturate agents in procedural sedation are available. According to the data, barbiturate agents are more effective than placebo.15, 17-19 Many clinical trials comparing barbiturates to propofol, etomidate, chloral hydrate, or a benzodiazepine are available. According to these data, the barbiturate agents have similar efficacy when compared to other sedative agents but may also be associated with higher rates of adverse events.20-28
• Are there patient subgroups based on demographics (e.g., age, racial groups,
gender) or comorbidities for which one of the barbiturates is more effective or
associated with fewer adverse effects?
There is limited evidence available comparing the barbiturates in the pediatric
population. Barbiturate use in neonates, infants, and children requires special care because of the differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics in these patient populations. For example, the phenobarbital half-life elimination is 53-140 hours in adults but is 45-500 hours in neonates.3, 4 This means it takes much longer for the drug to be removed from the body in neonates and can result in increased adverse events. Dosing barbiturates in neonates, infants, and children should be based on weight, gestational age, and blood concentration levels. In addition, infants of mothers physically dependent on barbiturates are at high risk for developing dependency and subsequent withdrawal of the barbiturate resulting in vomiting, tremors, and, potentially, seizures after birth.29, 30 Barbiturate withdrawal in a new infant is usually treated by administering and gradually decreasing doses of phenobarbital. Geriatrics
There is limited evidence available comparing barbiturate use in the geriatric
population. Older adults are at increased risk of experiencing adverse events with barbiturate use as a result of the potentially reduced ability to metabolize the drug.3, 4 In addition, barbiturates are potent CNS depressants, have a low therapeutic index, are highly addictive, and are implicated in many drug interactions which can increase the risk of adverse events in this patient population.31 Data from two large clinical trials demonstrate an increased risk for hip fracture in older patients taking barbiturates.32, 33 As a result, barbiturates are not recommended for use in the geriatric population unless used for control of seizures. Patients with a History of Drug/Alcohol Abuse
There is limited evidence available comparing the barbiturates in patients with a
history of drug/alcohol abuse. Because these agents are associated with high risk of addiction and overdose can be lethal, these agents should not be used in patients with a history of or high risk for substance abuse.3, 4
Adverse Drug Reactions
• How does the safety of the barbiturates compare with each other?
The barbiturates are associated with many, potentially serious adverse events. The
most common drug-related adverse events reported with barbiturate use are related to CNS depression. CNS effects may include drowsiness, confusion, dizziness, and
headache. Barbiturates can also produce dose-dependent decreases in blood pressure and respiratory depression.6 Short-term administration of barbiturates has little to no effect on the hepatic or renal systems.6 Barbiturate agents are highly toxic in acute overdose. Symptoms of an overdose may include sluggishness, incoordination, difficulty in thinking, slowness of speech, impaired judgment, staggering, respiratory depression, coma, and death. Patients who survive barbiturate toxicity may develop renal failure secondary to anoxia. Tolerance to barbiturates can develop quickly (< 2 weeks) and withdrawal occurs in patients who have become physically dependant on the agent. Other adverse events reported with the barbiturates include vertigo, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, irritability, and paradoxical excitement.
Comparative clinical evidence evaluating the safety of the barbiturates is limited.
One study evaluated the frequency of reported adverse reactions to various sedative hypnotic agents in a 1000-bed teaching hospital over a three year period.34 During this time, no adverse events were reported with pentobarbital use (546 doses dispensed) and only one adverse event (hypersensitivity skin reaction) was reported with phenobarbital use (21,531 doses dispensed). A second study of adverse sedation events reported in pediatric patients found a relatively even distribution of adverse events across the major drug classes (opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and other sedative/hypnotics).35 In addition, there are many case reports and review articles documenting the risks associated with long-term use (tolerance, dependence, withdrawal) and overdose (CNS and respiratory depression).
Many drug interactions are associated with the barbiturate agents.3, 4 Barbiturates
can potentiate sedation by other agents, particularly ethanol and benzodiazepines. Barbiturates can also competitively inhibit the metabolism of some drugs (via the P450 system; e.g. CYP 3A4) or increase the rate of hepatic clearance of some drugs with chronic barbiturate use. Barbiturates are contraindicated in patients with dyspnea or airway obstruction and porphyria and should be used with caution in patients with severe liver or renal disease.
The barbiturate agents are used as general anesthetics in procedural sedation.
Barbiturates have narrow therapeutic indexes and their use is limited. The barbiturate agents indicated in procedural sedation/anesthesia include amobarbital, methohexital, secobarbital, and thiopental. No comparative clinical trials or meta-analyses evaluating the oral barbiturate agents in procedural sedation are available for evaluation. Some placebo-controlled evidence suggests barbiturate agents are more effective than placebo, although they maybe associated with higher rates of side effects when compared to other drug classes, such as benzodiazepines or propofol. High rates of tolerance and adverse events are reported in the literature with barbiturate use in mental health disorders. Clinical evidence evaluating the use of barbiturates in neonates, geriatric patients, or patients with a history of substance abuse suggests barbiturate use should be avoided in these patient populations. The barbiturate agents are associated with many, potentially
serious adverse events with long-term use. The most common drug-related adverse events reported with barbiturate use are related to CNS depression. Barbiturate agents are highly toxic in acute overdose and may result in death.
Charney DS, Mihic SJ, Haris RA. Chapter 16. Hypnotics and Sedatives. In: Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL,
eds. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 11e. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing. 2.
Lacy CF, Armstrong LL, Goldman MP, Lance LL, eds. Drug Information Handbook. 12th ed. Hudson, OH:
Lacy CF, Armstrong LL, Goldman MP, Lance LL, eds. Drug Information Handbook. 12th ed. Hudson, OH:
McEvoy GK, Snow EK, Kester L, Litvak K, Miller J, Welsh OH, eds. AHFS 2011 Drug Information.
Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2011. 5.
Sternbach LH. The benzodiazepine story. J Psychoactive Drugs 1983;15:15-7.
Patel PM, Patel HH, Roth DM. Chapter 19. General Anesthetics and Therapeutic Gases. In: Brunton LL,
Chabner BA, Knollmann BC, eds. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 7.
Lund N, Papadakos PJ. Barbiturates, neuroleptics, and propofol for sedation. Crit Care Clin 1995;11:875-86.
Shah AK, Atkinson MD, Gupta P, et al. Transient shivering during Wada test provides insight into human
thermoregulation. Epilepsia;51:745-51. 9.
Loddenkemper T, Moddel G, Dinner DS, et al. Language assessment in Wada test: comparison of methohexital
and amobarbital. Seizure 2009;18:656-9. 10.
Andelman F, Kipervasser S, Reider G, II, Fried I, Neufeld MY. Hippocampal memory function as reflected by
the intracarotid sodium methohexital Wada test. Epilepsy Behav 2006;9:579-86. 11.
Buchtel HA, Passaro EA, Selwa LM, Deveikis J, Gomez-Hassan D. Sodium methohexital (brevital) as an
anesthetic in the Wada test. Epilepsia 2002;43:1056-61. 12.
Henderson BN, 2nd, Triplett RG, Gage TW. Anxiolytic therapy. Oral and intravenous sedation. Dent Clin
Dew RE, Kimball JN, Rosenquist PB, McCall WV. Seizure length and clinical outcome in electroconvulsive
therapy using methohexital or thiopental. J ECT 2005;21:16-8. 14.
Mason KP, Zurakowski D, Connor L, et al. Infant sedation for MR imaging and CT: oral versus intravenous
pentobarbital. Radiology 2004;233:723-8. 15.
Akhlaghpoor S, Shabestari AA, Moghdam MS. Low dose of rectal thiopental sodium for pediatric sedation in
spiral computed tomography study. Pediatr Int 2007;49:387-91. 16.
Bahn MM, Lin W, Silbergeld DL, et al. Localization of language cortices by functional MR imaging compared
with intracarotid amobarbital hemispheric sedation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:575-9. 17.
Manuli MA, Davies L. Rectal methohexital for sedation of children during imaging procedures. AJR Am J
Lerman B, Yoshida D, Levitt MA. A prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of methohexital in the
emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:351-4. 19.
Glasier CM, Stark JE, Brown R, James CA, Allison JW. Rectal thiopental sodium for sedation of pediatric
patients undergoing MR and other imaging studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:111-4. 20.
Diaz-Guzman E, Mireles-Cabodevila E, Heresi GA, Bauer SR, Arroliga AC. A comparison of methohexital
versus etomidate for endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care;19:48-54. 21.
Lee JS, Gonzalez ML, Chuang SK, Perrott DH. Comparison of methohexital and propofol use in ambulatory
procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1996-2003. 22.
Zgleszewski SE, Zurakowski D, Fontaine PJ, D'Angelo M, Mason KP. Is propofol a safe alternative to
pentobarbital for sedation during pediatric diagnostic CT? Radiology 2008;247:528-34. 23.
Dalal PG, Murray D, Cox T, McAllister J, Snider R. Sedation and anesthesia protocols used for magnetic
resonance imaging studies in infants: provider and pharmacologic considerations. Anesth Analg 2006;103:863-8. 24.
Yanay O, Brogan TV, Martin LD. Continuous pentobarbital infusion in children is associated with high rates
of complications. J Crit Care 2004;19:174-8. 25.
Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR, et al. Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation of children
undergoing MRI: efficacy and recovery characteristics. Paediatr Anaesth 2004;14:589-95. 26.
Mason KP, Sanborn P, Zurakowski D, et al. Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in
infants during imaging. Radiology 2004;230:537-42. 27.
Rooks VJ, Chung T, Connor L, et al. Comparison of oral pentobarbital sodium (nembutal) and oral chloral
hydrate for sedation of infants during radiologic imaging: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1125-8.
Bloomfield EL, Masaryk TJ, Caplin A, et al. Intravenous sedation for MR imaging of the brain and spine in
children: pentobarbital versus propofol. Radiology 1993;186:93-7. 29.
Zuppa AA, Carducci C, Scorrano A, et al. Infants born to mothers under phenobarbital treatment: correlation
between serum levels and clinical features of neonates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol;159:53-6. 30.
Zuppa AF, Nicolson SC, Barrett JS, Gastonguay MR. Population pharmacokinetics of pentobarbital in
neonates, infants, and children after open heart surgery. J Pediatr;159:414-9 e1-3. 31.
Knight EL, Avorn J. Quality indicators for appropriate medication use in vulnerable elders. Ann Intern Med
Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL, et al. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast
Hip Fracture Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1326-31. 33.
MacDonald JB, MacDonald ET. Nocturnal femoral fracture and continuing widespread use of barbiturate
Mendelson WB, Thompson C, Franko T. Adverse reactions to sedative/hypnotics: three years' experience.
Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C. Adverse sedation events in pediatrics:
analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics 2000;106:633-44.
Traitement des piqûres de bourdons et allergies 1. Piqûres de bourdons ou d'abeilles Chez les bourdons, comme chez les abeilles mellifères et les guêpes, seules les reines et les ouvrières ont dard. Les mâles n’en ont donc pas. Le dard a une fonction de défense. Lors d’une piqûre, une petite quantivenin est injectée dans le corps par le biais du dard. Chez l’homme, la pi
Unexpected high serum levels of tacrolimus aftera single topical application in an infantResearch Institute for Environmental Health at the Heinrich-Topical tacrolimus has been found to be effective andsafe for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults andSupported by the Elterninitiative Kinderkrebsklinik e. V., Du¨sseldorf, andchildren.We report an infant with severe combinedDeutsche