Swine Influenza A (H1N1) Infection in Two Children — Southern California, March–April 2009
On April 17, 2009, CDC determined that two cases of febrile
outpatient clinic, and a nasopharyngeal swab was collected for
respiratory illness occurring in children who resided in adjacent
testing as part of a clinical study. The boy received symptomatic
counties in southern California were caused by infection with
treatment, and all his symptoms resolved uneventfully within
a swine influenza A (H1N1) virus. The viruses from the two
approximately 1 week. The child had not received influenza
cases are closely related genetically, resistant to amantadine
vaccine during this influenza season. Initial testing at the clinic
and rimantadine, and contain a unique combination of gene
using an investigational diagnostic device identified an influ-
segments that previously has not been reported among swine
enza A virus, but the test was negative for human influenza
or human influenza viruses in the United States or elsewhere.
subtypes H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1. The San Diego County
Neither child had contact with pigs; the source of the infection
Health Department was notified, and per protocol, the speci-
is unknown. Investigations to identify the source of infection
men was sent for further confirmatory testing to reference labo-
and to determine whether additional persons have been il from
ratories, where the sample was verified to be an unsubtypable
infection with similar swine influenza viruses are ongoing. This
influenza A strain. On April 14, 2009, CDC received clinical
report briefly describes the two cases and the investigations
specimens and determined that the virus was swine influenza
currently under way. Although this is not a new subtype of
A (H1N1). The boy and his family reported that the child
influenza A in humans, concern exists that this new strain of
had had no exposure to pigs. Investigation of potential animal
swine influenza A (H1N1) is substantial y different from human
exposures among the boy’s contacts is continuing. The patient’s
influenza A (H1N1) viruses, that a large proportion of the popu-
mother had respiratory symptoms without fever in the first few
lation might be susceptible to infection, and that the seasonal
days of April 2009, and a brother aged 8 years had a respiratory
influenza vaccine H1N1 strain might not provide protection.
illness 2 weeks before illness onset in the patient and had a
The lack of known exposure to pigs in the two cases increases
second illness with cough, fever, and rhinorrhea on April 11,
the possibility that human-to-human transmission of this new
2009. However, no respiratory specimens were collected from
influenza virus has occurred. Clinicians should consider animal
either the mother or brother during their acute illnesses. Public
as well as seasonal influenza virus infections in their differential
health officials are conducting case and contact investigations
diagnosis of patients who have febrile respiratory illness and
to determine whether illness has occurred among other rela-
who 1) live in San Diego and Imperial counties or 2) traveled
tives and contacts in California, and during the family’s travel
to these counties or were in contact with il persons from these
counties in the 7 days preceding their illness onset, or 3) had
Patient B. CDC received an influenza specimen on April 17,
recent exposure to pigs. Clinicians who suspect swine influenza
2009, that had been forwarded as an unsubtypable influenza
virus infections in a patient should obtain a respiratory specimen
A virus from the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego,
and contact their state or local health department to facilitate
California. CDC identified this specimen as a swine influenza
testing at a state public health laboratory.
A (H1N1) virus on April 17, 2009, and notified the California
Department of Public Health. The source of the specimen,
Case Reports
patient B, is a girl aged 9 years who resides in Imperial County,
Patient A. On April 13, 2009, CDC was notified of a case
California, adjacent to San Diego County. On March 28,
of respiratory illness in a boy aged 10 years who lives in San
2009, she had onset of cough and fever (104.3°F [40.2°C]).
Diego County, California. The patient had onset of fever,
She was taken to an outpatient facility that was participating
cough, and vomiting on March 30, 2009. He was taken to an
in an influenza surveillance project, treated with amoxicillin/
centers for disease control and prevention
MMWR Dispatch April 21, 2009
clavulanate potassium and an antihistamine, and has since
influenza virus surveillance program to better understand the
recovered uneventfully. The child had not received influenza
epidemiology and ecology of swine influenza virus infections
vaccine during this influenza season. The patient and her par-
ents reported no exposure to pigs, although the girl did attend
The viruses in these two patients demonstrate antiviral
an agricultural fair where pigs were exhibited approximately
resistance to amantadine and rimantadine, and testing to
4 weeks before illness onset. She reported that she did not see
determine susceptibility to the neuraminidase inhibitor drugs
pigs at the fair and went only to the amusement section of the
oseltamivir and zanamivir is under way. Because these viruses
fair. The Imperial County Public Health Department and the
carry a unique combination of genes, no information currently
California Department of Public Health are now conducting an
is available regarding the efficiency of transmission in swine or
investigation to determine possible sources of infection and to
in humans. Investigations to understand transmission of this
identify any additional human cases. The patient’s brother aged
13 years had influenza-like symptoms on April 1, 2009, and
Reported by: M Ginsberg, MD, J Hopkins, MPH, A Maroufi, MPH,
a male cousin aged 13 years living in the home had influenza-
G Dunne, DVM, DR Sunega, J Giessick, P McVay, MD, San Diego County Health and Human Svcs; K Lopez, MD, P Kriner, MPH,
like symptoms on March 25, 2009, 3 days before onset of the
K Lopez, S Munday, MD, Imperial County Public Health Dept;
patient’s symptoms. The brother and cousin were not tested
K Harriman, PhD, B Sun, DVM, G Chavez, MD, D Hatch, MD,
for influenza at the time of their illnesses. R Schechter, MD, D Vugia, MD, J Louie, MD, California Dept of Public Health. W Chung, MD, Dal as County Health and Human Svcs; Epidemiologic and Laboratory N Pascoe, S Penfield, MD, J Zoretic, MD, V Fonseca, MD, Texas Dept of State Health Svcs. P Blair, PhD, D Faix, PhD, Naval Health Research Investigations Center; J Tueller, MD, Navy Medical Center, San Diego, California.
As of April 21, 2009, no epidemiologic link between patients
T Gomez, DVM, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Svc, US Dept
A and B had been identified, and no additional cases of infec-
of Agriculture. F Averhoff, MD, F Alavrado-Ramy, MD, S Waterman, MD, J Neatherlin, MPH, Div of Global Migration and Quarantine;
tion with the identified strain of swine influenza A (H1N1)
L Finelli, DrPH, S Jain, MD, L Brammer, MPH, J Bresee, MD,
had been identified. Surveillance data from Imperial and San
C Bridges, MD, S Doshi, MD, R Donis, PhD, R Garten, PhD, J Katz,
Diego counties, and from California overall, showed declin-
PhD, S Klimov, PhD, D Jernigan, MD, S Lindstrom, PhD, B Shu,
ing influenza activity at the time of the two patients’ illnesses.
MD, T Uyeki, MD, X Xu, MD, N Cox, PhD, Influenza Div, National
Case and contact investigations by the county and state
Center for Infectious and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.
departments of health in California and Texas are ongoing.
Editorial Note: In the past, CDC has received reports of
Enhanced surveillance for possible additional cases is being
approximately one human swine influenza virus infection
every 1–2 years in the United States (2,3). However, during
Preliminary genetic characterization of the influenza viruses
December 2005–January 2009, 12 cases of human infection
has identified them as swine influenza A (H1N1) viruses. The
with swine influenza were reported; five of these 12 cases
viruses are similar to each other, and the majority of their
occurred in patients who had direct exposure to pigs, six in
genes, including the hemagglutinin (HA) gene, are similar to
patients reported being near pigs, and the exposure in one case
those of swine influenza viruses that have circulated among
was unknown (1,4,5). In the United States, novel influenza A
U.S. pigs since approximately 1999; however, two genes cod-
virus infections in humans, including swine influenza infec-
ing for the neuraminidase (NA) and matrix (M) proteins are
tions, have been nationally notifiable conditions since 2007.
similar to corresponding genes of swine influenza viruses of the
The recent increased reporting might be, in part, a result of
Eurasian lineage (1). This particular genetic combination of
increased influenza testing capabilities in public health labo-
swine influenza virus segments has not been recognized previ-
ratories, but genetic changes in swine influenza viruses and
ously among swine or human isolates in the United States, or
other factors also might be a factor (1,4,5). Although the vast
elsewhere based on analyses of influenza genomic sequences
majority of human infections with animal influenza viruses do
available on GenBank.* Viruses with this combination of genes
not result in human-to-human transmission (2,3), each case
are not known to be circulating among swine in the United
should be fully investigated to be certain that such viruses are
States; however, no formal national surveil ance system exists to
not spreading among humans and to limit further exposure
determine what viruses are prevalent in the U.S. swine popula-
of humans to infected animals, if infected animals are identi-
tion. Recent collaboration between the U.S. Department of
fied. Such investigations should include close collaboration
Agriculture and CDC has led to development of a pilot swine
between state and local public health officials with animal
MMWR Dispatch
The lack of known exposure to pigs in the two cases described
Interim guidance on infection control, treatment, and
in this report increases the possibility that human-to-human
chemoprophylaxis for swine influenza is available at
transmission of this new influenza virus has occurred.
Clinicians should consider animal as wel as seasonal influenza
information about swine influenza is available at
virus infections in the differential diagnosis of patients with
febrile respiratory illness who live in San Diego and Imperial
References
counties or have traveled to these areas or been in contact
1. Vincent AL, Ma W, Lager KM, Janke BH, Richt JA. Swine influenza
with ill persons from these areas in the 7 days before their
viruses: a North American perspective. Adv Virus Res 2008;72:127–54.
illness onset. In addition, clinicians should consider animal
2. Myers KP, Olsen CW, Gray GC. Cases of swine influenza in humans: a
review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:1084–8.
influenza infections among persons with febrile respiratory
3. Wells DL, Hopfensperger DJ, Arden NH, et al. Swine influenza virus
il ness who have been near pigs, such as attending fairs or
infections. Transmission from ill pigs to humans at a Wisconsin agricul-
other places where pigs might be displayed. Clinicians who
tural fair and subsequent probable person-to-person transmission. JAMA
suspect swine influenza virus infections in humans should
4. Vincent AL, Swenson SL, Lager KM, Gauger PC, Loiacono C, Zhang Y.
obtain a nasopharyngeal swab from the patient, place the swab
Characterization of an influenza A virus isolated from pigs during an
in a viral transport medium, and contact their state or local
outbreak of respiratory disease in swine and people during a county fair
in the United States. Vet Microbiol 2009;online publication ahead of
health department to facilitate transport and timely diagnosis
at a state public health laboratory. CDC requests that state
5. Newman AP, Reisdorf E, Beinemann J, et al. Human case of swine influ-
public health laboratories send all influenza A specimens that
enza A (H1N1) triple reassortant virus infection, Wisconsin. Emerg Infect
cannot be subtyped to the CDC, Influenza Division, Virus
Surveillance and Diagnostics Branch Laboratory.
NCRI Palliative Care Clinical Studies Group 2006-7 The remit of the Group is in line with the existing Clinical Studies Groups and the primary aimis to develop a portfolio of national collaborative studies, which are clinically relevant andlikely to have an impact on day-to-day practice. The full committee is concerned withdeveloping a strategy for the Group and identifying priorities for palli